A homeowner who is willing to sell his house to a developer so 62 new homes can be built says he has been ostracised from the local community and abused by neighbours because of it – but he doesn’t care.Aile Homes is desperate to buy Perry Mason’s Maidstone property off him so they can use it as an access site for their collosal new estate that has spent years in development hell.And the 64-year-old is more than happy to sell up, despite what his neighbours think, as he has been given ‘an offer [he] cannot refuse’.Planning permission for the controversial development was granted five years ago despite severe local objections and many villagers believe the developers should be made to go through the process again due to their lack of action.However Aile Homes has argued that as they installed a piece of kerb near the site four days before their December 20 2021 construction deadline they have technically made a ‘material start’ on works and do not need to seek permission again.The circus around the new estate has left Mr Mason having to grapple with the uneasy fact he will sell out his neighbours if he sells off his land.But the transport manager, who paid £40,000 for his house 24 years ago, says whatever happens it was a ‘win-win’ situation for him as the offer he recieved was substantially more than what he originally paid for his home – though he refused to say what it was.  Perry Mason (pictured) says he is being abused in the street as he is willing to sell his home to a developer Furious locals in Maidstone, Kent, claim they are ready to fight the plans for 62 new homes ‘tooth and nail’ as the development will destroy their views. Aile Homes said it did not need permission for 62 homes because it had installed a kerb three years agoMr Mason admits locals living just yards away from him are furious – with some verbally abusing him in the street over the situation. He told MailOnline: ‘From a selfish point of view, I hope it is approved. The developers want to buy our house.’They have given us an offer we cannot refuse. It’s great. The value has gone up and up and up throughout this whole process.’I am in a win-win. If it goes ahead, I will sell the property to them and move.’If not, then I will buy the land anyway where they want to build the homes, and then my home increases in value.’It does not really matter to me what happens, I am happy. My name around here is mud. I am not popular.’It is more than 11 years since Chailey Homes first submitted an outline application to Maidstone council, seeking permission to build 62 homes on empty land.The site is actually on one side of the single-width track which runs from Redstart Avenue, past the Richmond Way green space, past the entrance to the bungalow known as The Lodge, and heads towards Hayle Place. The developer went on to get approval for a detailed plan in December 2019 but it was never finished.It was a condition of the original planning permission that work on the development must start within two years – which would have been before December 20, 2021.Four days before that deadline, Chailey Homes had contractors lay kerbing at the entrance, extending for 35 metres. Chailey Homes first submitted an outline application to Maidstone council, seeking permission to build 62 homes on empty land (pictured)  The site is actually on one side of the single-width track which runs from Redstart Avenue, past the Richmond Way green space, past the entrance to the bungalow known as The Lodge (pictured) and heads towards Hayle Place Four days before that deadline, Chailey Homes had contractors lay kerbing at the entrance, extending for 35 metresIt is believed that part of the problem was a dispute over the ownership of the land that gave access to the site. What is a ‘material start’ and is it a loophole? When planning permission is given for a new development, the descision notice will often state that building must begin within a certain time frame from when permission is granted. In this instance, Chailey Homes recieved permission for 62 new homes in December 2019 on the condition that development must start by December 21 2021. Aile Homes, which has taken on the development, now argues that a ‘material start’ was made and has applied for a certificate of lawfulness which means they would not need to seek permission again. According to legislation, making a material start can be defined as any change in the use of any land which constitutes material development. But Mr Mason has little sympathy for those involved in the altercation: ‘I do not care in the slightest. I have been here 28 years and have seen it all. The people moaning should have looked into the situation.’If you buy a house with a great big field behind it, you should expect the chance of homes being built.’This has been ongoing for years. It has dragged on and on. They should have done their homework. There’s very little point moaning about it now.’ Chailey Homes went on to sell the plot to a new developer, Aile Homes.The company has submitted an application to Maidstone council for a certificate of lawfulness, claiming a ‘material start’ has been made on the development since permission was given.If granted, the firm will avoid having to go through the whole planning process again.The original application received 110 individual letters of objections, plus objections from the three ward councillors and both Loose and Tovil parish councils.Mr Mason said he believed the Labour government’s policy of wanting to build on green belt land would see it go through.He added: ‘Angela Rayner is very keen on this sort of thing. I think it will go through.’  Driving instructor Gavin Williams (pictured)  said he believed it would ruin the area locally Aile Homes submitted an application to Maidstone council for a certificate of lawfulness, claiming a ‘material start’ has been made on the development since permission was given.(pictured: A General View Of The Road Access Leading To And Past “The Lodge”) Mr Mason said locals had given him funny looks and verbally abused him in the street as a result of his decision to accept the offer. He added: ‘They would all do exactly the same as me. I have got to look after number one.’ He did not wish to say how much he had been offered, but said it was a lot more than the £40,000 which he had recently spent on the property.But locals do not share his passion.One said: ‘We intend to fight this tooth and nail. It’s arrogant. It’s ridiculous. To think you can put a kerb in and all is OK is mental. ‘The noise would be terrible. We would move if it goes ahead. It cannot be justified. The road here is already a dumping ground for cars.’Lynne Dawson, who lives nearby, said she strongly opposed the plans.The accountant said: ‘Nobody knows what is happening. I oppose it in the strongest terms.’ The original application received 110 individual letters of objections, plus objections from the three ward councillors and both Loose and Tovil parish councils (pictured: a view of the Richmond Way green space, which is part of the delvopment site) Social worker Iffy Okoye, 45, said access to the site would create ‘traffic nightmares’.She said: ‘It would be very bad. Cars cannot move at the best of times. Access would be a massive problem.’People park right outside my house. All those extra homes would make it worse and the building traffic would be a nightmare. The bin men struggle on a Tuesday as it is.’Driving instructor Gavin Williams, 36, said he believed it would ruin the area locally.He said: ‘Surely there’s better places? It will back right on to where I live. I will overlook it. It is also right next to a nature reserve, it’s terrible.’There is no suggestion any of the residents named have been involved in abusing Mr Mason. MailOnline approached Aile Homes for comment.